April 27, 2001 Judge gives green light to lead paint lawsuits
A Rhode Island judge has given the go-ahead to a state lawsuit against manufacturers of lead-based paint. The decision could prompt other states and communities to seek compensation from the lead industry for costs associated with abating the hazard posed by lead paint. In October 1999, Rhode Island filed suit against lead pigment manufacturers, seeking to recover resources needed to advance lead poisoning prevention programs. The state asked the court to require the defendants to detect and abate lead hazards in the state's public and private buildings, as well as support other measures to address the costs to taxpayers stemming from childhood lead poisoning.
Associate Justice Michael Silverstein of the Rhode Island State Superior Court denied a motion to dismiss filed by the defendants, thereby affirming the state's right to seek abatement costs for public and private property.
Numerous other lawsuits have been filed against the lead paint industry, including suits brought by the cities of San Francisco, Oakland, Calif., and St. Louis, two school districts in Houston, and Santa Clara, Solano and Santa Cruz counties in California.
In all Toxic Tort cases it is essential that measures be taken promptly to preserve evidence, investigate the incident in question, and to enable physicians or other expert witnesses to thoroughly evaluate any injuries. If you or a loved one is a victim of injury caused by a toxic substance, call now at or CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT A CASE FORM. The initial consultation is free of charge, and if we agree to accept your case, we will work on a contingent fee basis, which means we get paid for our services only if there is a monetary award or recovery of funds. Don't delay! You may have a valid claim and be entitled to compensation for your injuries, but a lawsuit must be filed before the statute of limitations expires.
The information and materials on this Web site are provided for general informational purposes only and are not intended to be legal advice. We attempt to provide quality information, but the law changes frequently and varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The information and materials provided are general in nature, and may not apply to a specific factual or legal circumstance. An attorney and client relationship should not be implied. Nothing on this Web site is intended to substitute for the advice of an attorney, therefore if you require legal advice please consult with a competent attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. All attorneys, unless otherwise noted in website, are not certified by Texas Board of Legal Specialization. See Terms of Use.